chain-roleplay-debate-synthesis

SKILL.md

State the decision clearly as a question, identify 2-5 stakeholder perspectives or roles that have legitimate but competing interests, and clarify what a successful synthesis looks like. See Decision Framing for guidance on choosing productive roles.

For each role, articulate their position, priorities, concerns, and evidence. Genuinely advocate for each viewpoint without strawmanning. See Roleplay Guidelines for authentic advocacy techniques and use resources/template.md for complete structure.

Facilitate direct clash between perspectives on key points of disagreement. Surface tensions, challenge assumptions, test edge cases, and identify cruxes (what evidence would change each perspective's mind). See Debate Structure for debate formats and facilitation techniques.

在面临具有多种合理观点和内在紧张的决策时使用。当利益相关者有相互竞争的优先事项（增长与可持续性、速度与质量、创新与风险）、需要在提交之前从不同角度对想法进行压力测试、探索不相容的价值观之间的权衡、将相互冲突的专家意见综合成连贯的策略或提出单观点分析可能会忽略的假设时，就可以调用。 来源：lyndonkl/claude。

查看原文