chain-roleplay-debate-synthesis

SKILL.md

State the decision clearly as a question, identify 2-5 stakeholder perspectives or roles that have legitimate but competing interests, and clarify what a successful synthesis looks like. See Decision Framing for guidance on choosing productive roles.

For each role, articulate their position, priorities, concerns, and evidence. Genuinely advocate for each viewpoint without strawmanning. See Roleplay Guidelines for authentic advocacy techniques and use resources/template.md for complete structure.

Facilitate direct clash between perspectives on key points of disagreement. Surface tensions, challenge assumptions, test edge cases, and identify cruxes (what evidence would change each perspective's mind). See Debate Structure for debate formats and facilitation techniques.

Úselo cuando enfrente decisiones con múltiples perspectivas legítimas y tensiones inherentes. Invocar cuando las partes interesadas tienen prioridades contrapuestas (crecimiento versus sostenibilidad, velocidad versus calidad, innovación versus riesgo), necesitan probar ideas desde diferentes ángulos antes de comprometerse, explorar compensaciones entre valores incompatibles, sintetizar opiniones de expertos contradictorias en una estrategia coherente o sacar a la superficie suposiciones que el análisis de un solo punto de vista pasaría por alto. Fuente: lyndonkl/claude.

Ver original