chain-roleplay-debate-synthesis

SKILL.md

State the decision clearly as a question, identify 2-5 stakeholder perspectives or roles that have legitimate but competing interests, and clarify what a successful synthesis looks like. See Decision Framing for guidance on choosing productive roles.

For each role, articulate their position, priorities, concerns, and evidence. Genuinely advocate for each viewpoint without strawmanning. See Roleplay Guidelines for authentic advocacy techniques and use resources/template.md for complete structure.

Facilitate direct clash between perspectives on key points of disagreement. Surface tensions, challenge assumptions, test edge cases, and identify cruxes (what evidence would change each perspective's mind). See Debate Structure for debate formats and facilitation techniques.

在面臨具有多種合理觀點和內在緊張的決策時使用。當利益相關者有相互競爭的優先事項（增長與可持續性、速度與質量、創新與風險）、需要在提交之前從不同角度對想法進行壓力測試、探索不相容的價值觀之間的權衡、將相互衝突的專家意見綜合成連貫的策略或提出單觀點分析可能會忽略的假設時，就可以調用。 來源：lyndonkl/claude。

查看原文