After a PR is merged or rejected, analyze what worked and what didn't to improve future contributions.
| Merged | Success | What worked? | | Closed (not merged) | Rejected | Why? | | Open (stale) | Ignored/abandoned | What went wrong? | | Changes requested | Needs work | What feedback? |
| Style | Naming, formatting, conventions | | Technical | Algorithm, architecture, patterns | | Scope | Too big, scope creep, unrelated changes | | Testing | Missing tests, coverage, edge cases | | Documentation | Missing docs, unclear comments | | Process | Wrong branch, missing sign-off |
Учитесь на результатах PR. Анализ принимает/отклоняет закономерности и обновляет уроки вклада. Триггеры: «пиар-ретро», «учитесь на пиаре», «результат пиара», «почему пиар отклонен», «анализируйте обратную связь с пиаром». Источник: boshu2/agentops.