sherlock-review

SKILL.md

| Claim | PR description, commit messages | Read thoroughly | | Code | Actual file changes | git diff | | Tests | Coverage, assertions | Run independently | | Behavior | Runtime output | Execute locally | | Timeline | When things happened | git log, git blame |

| ✓ TRUE | Evidence fully supports claim | | ⚠ PARTIALLY TRUE | Claim accurate but incomplete | | ✗ FALSE | Evidence contradicts claim | | ? NONSENSICAL | Claim doesn't apply to context |

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." Trust only reproducible evidence. Don't trust commit messages, documentation, or "works on my machine."

Evidence-based investigative code review using deductive reasoning to determine what actually happened versus what was claimed. Use when verifying implementation claims, investigating bugs, validating fixes, or conducting root cause analysis. Elementary approach to finding truth through systematic observation. Source: proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.

View raw