build-coherence

Evaluate competing approaches through independent assessment, explicit reasoning-out-loud advocacy, confidence-calibrated commitment thresholds, and structured deadlock resolution — producing coherent decisions from multiple reasoning paths.

Assess each approach on its own merits before comparing them. The critical rule: do not let the assessment of approach A bias the assessment of approach B.

Fill this out for each approach separately. Do not write a comparison until all individual evaluations are complete.

AI multi-path reasoning coherence using bee democracy — independent evaluation of competing approaches, waggle dance as reasoning-out-loud, quorum sensing for confidence thresholds, and deadlock resolution. Use when forage-solutions has identified multiple valid approaches and a selection must be made, when oscillating between options without committing, when justifying an architecture or tool choice with structured reasoning, or before an irreversible action where the cost of the wrong choice is high. Source: pjt222/development-guides.